efms Migration Report
August 2005 | | | | |
EU: German visa
ordinance in principle not contrary to EU regulations According to information that became known on 28 August
2005, the European Commission will not take legal steps against Germany for its disputed
visa decree. Pursuant to the standpoint of Franco Frattini, the EU justice commissioner, the
revised decree on a facilitated issue of visa of the Berlin-based Federal Foreign Office widely
complies with the provisions foreseen by EU law. Individual provisions of the visa policy as
employed by Germany and other states, however, would be critical. Moreover, there are still
differences of opinion between Berlin and Brussels: While Frattini demands a common visa
policy employed equally throughout the EU, the German Federal government insists in
principle on maintaining national autonomy. BZ
29.07.05
Visa quarrels before the
Word Youth Day
Prior to the World Youth Day, the Catholic Church and the German Foreign Ministry
agreed in 2004 on a procedure to facilitate the issue of visas for youths coming from Southern
Asia, Africa or Latin America and, at the same time, to take preventive actions so that visits
to Germany could not be used for illegal immigration. The following prerequisites to be
fulfilled by visitors from these regions were agreed: a personal application at a German
embassy, a letter of recommendation issued by the local bishop, an official registration in
Cologne as well as the presentation of return flight tickets. Now, the Church has blamed the
Foreign Ministry of not having adhered to the previous agreements. Youths from Togo,
Cameroon, India and central Africa had to present evidence that constituted partly
insuperable obstacles such as certificates of employment, extracts of account and real
property deeds. Furthermore, it was said to be incomprehensible that German embassies
refused to issue entry permits for twelve youths coming from the Limburg partner dioceses of
Kumba in Cameroon and for a group of more than 600 Filipinos even though they had
complied with all requirements. SZ 08.08.05 // FR
11.08.05
Federal Office for
Migration and Refugees: Revocation procedure criticised
The Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BMAF) plans to revoke the long-term
asylum entitlements of 10,000 refugees even in 2005. Refugees from Iraq will be mainly
affected. Compared to the 284 refugees that were recognised as political asylum seekers in
the first half of 2005, the BAMF revoked in the same period the asylum status of about 6,000
refugees. Within then next months, another 7,000 refugees are threatened by the revocation of
their status. This policy was justified by arguing that following the fall of the Saddam regime
the reasons establishing their status would not longer exist. Pro Asyl is concerned that similar
arguments could be used in the near future for revoking the protection of refugees coming
from Afghanistan. Refugee organisations as well as the UNHCR have sharply criticised this
policy by arguing that in no other European country such a huge number of asylum titles
would be withdrawn - with tendencies sharply on the rise. FR
27.08.05
More and more Germans
seeking employment abroad
In addition to the approximately 362,300 foreigners living in Austria already, 11,900 new
emigrants moved to the alpine republic in 2004, with 7,463 coming from Germany. A total of
about 50,000 Germans is now working in the alpine country and thus represent the
third-largest group of migrants after immigrants from former Yugoslavia and Turkey.
Australia and New Zealand have also reported about a considerably rising number of
Germans interested in emigrating to these countries: Compared to the period 2001/2002, the
number of labour visas issued for New Zealand in the fiscal year 2004/2005 has doubled to
4,600. FR 13.08.05 // FTD 18.08.05
Demonstrations to
commemorate Hess remain prohibited
Following the Federal Constitutional Court’s refusal of an urgent petition issued
on 16 August 2005, the commemorative demonstration to honour Hitler"s deputy, Rudolf
Hess, planned by the right-wing party NPD for the 20 August 2005 in Wunsiedel remains
prohibited. In its ruling (Ref.: 1 BvQ 25/05), the highest German court referred to a penal
provision adopted by the German parliament and in force since 1 April 2005 according to
which "whoever publicly or in a meeting approves, glorifies or justifies acts of violence
or arbitrary acts committed under the rule of National Socialism in a manner capable of
disturbing the public peace by injuring the honour of the victims" is committing an
offence (§ 130, paragraph 4, German Penal Code - StGB). The citizens" initiative
"Wunsiedel ist bunt - nicht braun" (Wunsiedel is coloured and not Nazi-brown)
was relieved about the decision. The "Day of Democracy" scheduled for 20
August 2005 will nonetheless take place with the participation of probably 30 organisations
and 115 smaller gatherings. It is planned to set-up information booths in the town centre, to
deploy a 300 metre long banner of fabric bearing signatures against right-wing extremism and
to organise a central demonstration with the participation of politicians such as Manfred
Stolpe, Werner Schnappauf, Klaus Uwe Benneter and Claudia Roth. Following a ruling of the
Administrative Court of Berlin, also a demonstration of the right-wing NPD party under the
motto "Rudolf Hess - gebt die Akten frei (release the files)" originally scheduled
for 24 August 2005 in the German capital remains prohibited. Press release BVerfG No. 74/2005 of 17 August 2005 // SZ 18.08.05 // Die
Welt 19.08.05
Preventive custody for
terror suspects?
In the context of the expulsion of six Iraqi nationals, suspect of belonging to the terrorist
group of Ansar Al-Islam, ordered on 3 August 2005, the Bavarian Minister of the Interior
Günther Beckstein (CSU) has concerns that the suspects could go underground despite
being under police surveillance. Therefore, he considers it indispensable to introduce
preventive custody for identified "potential attackers" who cannot be deported
immediately due to legal or factual obstacles. The taking into custody of dangerous persons
for a maximum of six months would be absolutely necessary in individual cases in order to
prevent terrorist attacks. Even Federal Interior Minister Otto Schily (SPD) considers this
proposal worth thinking about. In weighing up the valuable good of personal freedom against
the endangering of the freedom as well as the security and safety of other citizens, special
countermeasures against such threats would have to be taken. Among members of the
governing coalition of SPD and Greens, Schily"s statement met with disapproval. BZ 01.08.05 // SZ 03.08.05 // SZ 04.08.05 // FAZ 04.08.05 // FR 23.08.05 //
SZ 27.08.05 // FR 27.08.05
Terror trial: 7 years of
imprisonment for Motassadeq
In a renewal of the first criminal proceeding worldwide in the context of the terrorist
attacks of 11 September 2001 in the US, the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Hamburg has
sentenced Mounir el Motassadeq to seven years of imprisonment in its judgement of 19
August 2005. Contrary to the first trail held in February 2003, the OLG this time could not
find sufficient evidence for finding him guilty of aiding and abetting murder in more than
3,000 cases and hence for sentencing him to a maximum penalty of 15 years of
imprisonment. The judgement of 2003 was set aside following the lodging of an appeal of the
defendant before the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) for defects in the tendering of evidence.
With the judgement resulting from the second trial, however, the proceeding will be probably
not have come to an end. The Federal Public Prosecutor, Walter Hemberger, still demands the
maximum penalty while Motassadeq"s counsel of defence claim the defendant"s acquittal. On
22 August 2005, both parties lodged a new appeal at the BGH. Meanwhile, Federal Minister
of the Interior, Otto Schily (SPD) welcomed the judgement as a clear sign for the willingness
of the constitutional state in its fight against terrorism and stressed that he would keep on
taking severe and decisive actions against all who would try to attack German society and
who pretend to destroy the peaceful cohabitation through murder and terror be it as
individuals or by forming criminal organisations. FAZ 10.08.05 //
FAZ 13.08.05 // FAZ 16.08.05 // SZ 16.08.05 // dpa 18.08.05 // dpa 19.08.05 // Press release
BMI 19.08.05 // NN 20.08.05 // FAZ 23.08.05 // SZ 24.08.05
Hesse: Asylum seekers
interrogated by Vietnamese officials
The Refugee Council of Hesse severely criticised the "dubious
circumstances" under which the identity of 300 Vietnamese asylum seekers was
checked in Mühlheim/Main by a delegation of the Vietnamese Ministry of the Interior.
In contrast to the point of view of the Regional Council of Darmstadt in charge, which
considered the measure "an absolutely normal procedure", the Refugee Council
criticised it would "comply under no circumstances with basic legal principles"
and added that no lawyers or any other advisers had been admitted and neither the kind of
questions asked nor the composition of the delegation had been revealed. The Regional
Council confirmed that already in the previous year 2004 the identity of Vietnamese citizens
was examined this way. Similar procedures would be applied in the case of Algerians and
citizens of "Central African states". In addition, this procedure would be
employed by other Federal states as well. Only in July, two Hamburg-based lawyers criticised
the visit of government officials from Guinea to check the identity of 347 citizens of the
Western African state allocated in three Federal states. FR
02.08.05
Munich: Teaching ban on
German-Islamic School
The local government of Upper Bavaria has cancelled the licence of the
"German-Islamic School" in Munich to offer classes in the school year
2005/2006 and has withdrawn the state subsidy. According to the Office for the Protection of
the Constitution, the school operator - the German-Islamic Educational Society (DIBW) -
which was appointed two years ago, is suspect of maintaining personal and economic links to
Islamic fundamentalists. The Bavarian Ministry of Education and Culture is concerned that
"the Islamistic attitude could have a negative influence on the pupils". Following
this decision, parents of pupils attending the school lodged an appeal against it before the
Administrative Court of Munich, delivered a letter of protest to the local government of
Upper Bavaria and organised a demonstration in the city centre on 20 August 2005 against
the school"s shut down with the participation of more than 100 pupils, teachers and school
leavers. SZ 06.08.05 // SZ 10.08.05 // Die Welt 10.08.05 // FR
12.08.05 // SZ 18.08.05 // SZ 22.08.05
Asylum statistics
In August 2005, a total of 2,423 persons have submitted an application for political
asylum in Germany. Compared to July, the number of asylum seekers has thus increased by
12.7 per cent (+273 persons). Compared to August 2004, respective figures have fallen by
17.7 per cent (-520 persons). The main countries of origin in August were Serbia and
Montenegro (425), Turkey (231) and Iraq (173) followed by the Russian Federation (137) and
Vietnam (110). In August 2005, the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees has reviewed
the applications of 3,875 asylum seekers, 34 (0.9 per cent) of whom have been recognised as
entitled to political asylum. A further 175 persons (4.5 per cent) have been granted protection
against deportation according to §60, paragraph 1, Residence Law. The applications of
2,282 persons (58.9 per cent) have been rejected. The cases of another 1,384 persons (35.7
per cent) have been closed for other reasons, for example because asylum seekers have
withdrawn their applications. Press release BMI 14.09.05
August 2005 | | | | |
|